|
R
A T I N G A G E
N C Y C
R I T E R I A
Bond Rating
Summary
Much of the
debt issued by governmental entities is rated by private, independent
bond rating companies. The bond ratings assigned by these companies
reflect the degree of risk associated with the bonds. There are
three major companies which rate municipal debt issues in the
United States:
- Moody's
Investors Service; (Moody's)
- Standard
and Poor's Corporation; and - (S&P)
- Fitch's
Investors Service. (Fitch)
Each of the
rating companies has a rating scale which reflects the degree
of risk associated with a bond. High-end ratings reflect the lowest-risk
issues; typically these bonds can be issued at lower interest
rates.
- The Moody's
scale ranges from "Aaa" on the high end to "C"
on the low end with seven intermediate categories.
- Standard
and Poor's index ranges from "AAA" to "D"
with eight intermediate categories.
The rating
companies use very similar criteria in determining municipal bond
ratings. Each identifies essentially the same four principal credit
factors which figure into the rating of long- term bonds:
- economic
factors;
- debt factors;
- governmental/administrative
factors; and
- fiscal/financial
performance factors.
Bond Ratings
Bond
Rating Categories
Although bonds
do not legally require a rating, issuers are compelled by circumstances
to have most of their large debt issues rated. Investors use the
bond ratings to analyze the degree of risk associated with purchasing
various public securities. High ratings reflect a low risk of
non- payment on principal and interest by the issuer, whereas
low ratings reflect a higher risk of non- payment.
There is a
clear inverse relationship between bond ratings and the interest
rates at which bonds are issued: the higher the bond rating, the
lower the interest rate for the bond due to the decreasing risk
of default. All long-term bonds rated below the fourth category
are judged to be below investment grade (speculative grade) and
are often referred to as "junk" bonds.
Bonds are
classified into two types for the purpose of the rating process
- short and long-term debt. To qualify as short-term debt, issues
cannot have maturity schedules of greater than four years. Many
bonds with maturity schedules of less than four years and all
bonds with maturity schedules of more than four years are considered
long-term debt. Standard Poor's and Moody's rate commercial paper
on a separate scale from other short-term notes.
Tables 1 and
2 describe the ratings for investment grade and non-investment
grade bonds.
Table
1. Bond Ratings for Long-Term Bonds of Investment Grade
| RATING |
EXPLANATION |
| Moody's
Aaa, S&P's AAA, and Fitch AAA |
These
ratings are the highest grade a bond can be assigned; Triple-A
bonds have a relatively small degree of risk because payment
is secured by a stable revenue source |
| Moody's
Aa, S&P's AA, and Fitch AA |
These
ratings are similar to that of triple A, but differ only in
that the revenue sources for double-A rated bonds are slightly
less secure than the revenue sources of triple-A bonds |
| Moody's
A, S&P's A, and Fitch A |
Considered
upper-medium grade, but revenue sources are relatively susceptible
to fluctuations in relevant economic conditions |
| Moody's
Baa, S&P's BBB, and Fitch BBB |
Medium-grade
obligations that are adequately protected and secured, but
nonetheless may be unreliable if relevant economic conditions
have long- run adverse effects on revenue source |
Source: Public
Finance Department, Moody's Investor Service, An Issuer's Guide
to the Rating Process, New York, NY, 1993 (information pamphlet);
Standard and Poor's Corporation, Municipal Finance Criteria, New
York, NY, 1994 (information pamphlet); Fitch Investor Service,
Fitch Ratings, New York, NY, 1994 (information pamphlet).
Table
2. Bond Ratings for Long-Term Bonds Below Investment Grade
| RATING |
EXPLANATION |
| Moody's
Ba, S&P's BB, and Fitch BB |
Lower-medium-grade
obligations that are presently adequately protected and secured,
but represent long-term risk whether relevant economic conditions
are favorable or not |
| Moody's
B, S&P's B, and Fitch B |
These
bonds are presently adequately protected and secured and represent
risk regardless of economic conditions. In addition, it is
likely that future relevant economic conditions will be unfavorable,
thus intensifying the probability of default |
| Moody's
Caa, S&P's CCC, and Fitch CCC |
Besides
future risks typical of bonds in the previous category, these
are presently not adequately protected and secured, as present
relevant economic conditions pose a threat to revenue source |
| Moody's
Ca, S&P's CC, and Fitch CC |
High
degree of present and future risk; Greater chance of default
by issuer; Debt issued in same conditions which produced CCC
rating of a prior issue; Given CC rating because of additional
insecurity of being issued after CCC bonds |
| Moody's
C, S&P's C, and Fitch C |
For S&P's
and Fitch, debt issued at same conditions which produced a
CCC-rating in a previous issue is given a C rating because
of additional insecurity of being issued after CCC-bonds;
For Moody's, these are "the lowest rated class of bonds,
and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor
prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing" |
| S&P's
CI |
Reserved
for income bonds on which no interest is being paid. |
| S&P's
D and Fitch DDD, DD, and D |
Assigned
these ratings when payment is due and issuer defaults. |
| S&P's
and Fitch |
Plus
(+) or minus (-): Indicate relative standing within the major
categories from AA to CCC |
| Moody's
"1" |
Used
to distinguish best bonds in each of five categories, Aa,
A, Baa, Ba, and B |
Source: Public
Finance Department, Moody's Investor Service, An Issuer's Guide
to the Rating Process, New York, NY, 1993 (information pamphlet);
Standard and Poor's Corporation, Municipal Finance Criteria, New
York, NY, 1994 (information pamphlet); Fitch Investor Service,
Fitch Ratings, New York, NY, 1994 (information pamphlet).
Short-Term
Debt
Moody's rates
short-term notes on the Moody's Investment Grade (MIG) scale.
Short-term notes issued with variable interest rates are rated
by Moody's on the Variable Moody's Investment Grade (VMIG) scale.
Notes must have a demand "put" feature to qualify for
VMIG designation. The criteria associated with these two scales
are identical.
Standard Poor's
assigns two ratings to any long- or short-term issue containing
as part of its provision a variable rate demand feature. The second
rating represents the demand feature. Fitch does not make a distinction
as it rates all short-term issues, including commercial paper,
on the same scale. Moody's and Standard Poor's rate commercial
paper, short-term obligations with a 365 days or less maturity,
on a different scale than short-term debt.
Tables 3 and
4 display the rating categories for short-term debt, short-term
notes, and commercial paper.
Table
3. Moody's Ratings for Short-Term Debt
| RATING |
EXPLANATION |
| MIG 1/VMIG
1 |
Superior
financial backing; Issuer has access to wide variety of financial
protection in the event primary revenue source is weakened |
| MIG 2/VMIG
2 |
Financial
backing is strong, but issuer does not have access to as wide
a variety of protection mechanisms as notes in higher category |
| MIG 3/VMIG
3 |
Financial
backing is still strong but protection mechanisms have the
possibility of failure |
| MIG 4/VMIG
4 |
Adequate
protection, but specific risk exists with this issue |
| SG |
Inadequate
protection of short-term issue |
Source: Public
Finance Department, Moody's Investor Service, An Issuer's Guide
to the Rating Process, New York, NY, 1993 (information pamphlet).
Table
4. S&P's and Fitch's Ratings for Notes
| RATING |
EXPLANATION |
| SP-1
and F-1 |
Strong
financial backing; Will be given a SP-1+ or F-1+ rating if
financial backing is undeniably strong |
| SP-2
and F-2 |
Issuer
has satisfactory, but not outstanding, capacity to pay principal
and interest |
| SP-3 |
Issuer
has only speculative capacity to pay principal and interest. |
| F-3 |
Issuer
has merely adequate capacity to pay principal and interest,
and changes in relevant conditions could easily cause these
issues to be of speculative quality |
| F-S |
Capacity
of issuer to pay principal and interest is speculative |
| D |
Fitch
assigns this rating to issues which are in actual or imminent
payment default |
Source: Standard
and Poor's Corporation, Municipal Finance Criteria, New York,
NY, 1994 (information pamphlet); Fitch Investor Service, Fitch
Ratings, New York, NY, 1994 (information pamphlet).
For
more information on our net lease properties, call
Keith A. Sturm, CCIM 612-376-4488 or Michael K. Houge, CCIM, SIOR
612-376-4474
|